CInt+Wiki+D

=**Student** Reviewers: Eleisha, Emily, Clare, Jess=

Topic reviewed: Collective Intelligence Wiki - Impact on Science and Health

 * Criteria Descriptors || Student Reviewer Feedback ||
 * ** Quality of Content ** || ||
 * Does the content (writing) make sense?

|| Yes but most of this writing is hard for us to understand. In the environment section it doesn't really talk about the environment; it talks more about companies, but the text makes good points ||
 * Can you identify any areas which need to be clearer?

|| No, although it would have been good if there was more simple language ||
 * What are three questions you would like to ask from your reading?

|| Why is [it] in brackets? Why wouldn't you tell your parents about the site that has suicides and get it blocked? Why can't one person come up with answers for everything? ||
 * ** Communication ** || ||
 * Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - effective communication?

|| Yes ||
 * Do they need more?

|| Yes, people should answer more questions, such as "I need an editor, any volunteers?" There was no reply ||
 * Are they clear in their messages to each other?

|| Yes but most of the start of their communication is cut off ||
 * Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?

|| Yes one of the discussions say sorry about something and they did something different ||
 * ** Collaboration ** || ||
 * Does the work appear to be equally shared?

|| Yes ||
 * Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?

|| Yes no one offered to be the editor ||
 * ** Presentation - Layout and Design ** || ||
 * Amount and relevance of graphics and media - comment on that

|| The layout and design needs to be improved. There is no colour on there apart from red. There is no help on what there talking about and what this site is about. It could be a little bit more exciting. They could add more pictures. ||
 * Recommendations?

||  ||