CInt+Wiki+C

=**Student** Reviewers: Kara=

Topic reviewed: Collective Intelligence Wiki - Impact on Arts, Entertainment and Leisure

 * Criteria Descriptors || Student Reviewer Feedback ||
 * ** Quality of Content ** || ||
 * Does the content (writing) make sense?

|| It does not make sense. It is difficult to identitfy what they are talking about. ||
 * Can you identify any areas which need to be clearer?

|| Maybe the introduction could have made it clearer ||
 * What are three questions you would like to ask from your reading?

|| What does collctive intelligence achieve? ||
 * ** Communication ** || ||
 * Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - effective communication?

|| ICommunication is good ||
 * Do they need more?

|| No. But you can't really tell - it depends on what they are talking about. ||
 * Are they clear in their messages to each other?

|| Yes. ||
 * Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?

|| Yes. ||
 * ** Collaboration ** || ||
 * Does the work appear to be equally shared?

|| Yes ||
 * Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?

|| No, not really. In their eyes it turned out to be really good. It was but it needed to be clearer. ||
 * ** Presentation - Layout and Design ** || ||
 * Amount and relevance of graphics and media - comment on that

|| Maybe more colour. In some cases the text needs to be bigger. More graphics and images. ||
 * Recommendations?

|| ||